Biological marker for inflammation

ABSTRACT

Inflammatory state in a subject is assayed by determining the level of expression of A 3  adenosine receptor (A 3 AR) in white blood cells (WBC), e.g. circulating WBCs, from the subject. A high level of expression of A 3 AR is indicative of an inflammatory state in the subject. This assay can be used for determining whether a patient known to have an inflammatory state should be treated with an A 3 AR agonist to reduce the inflammatory state. The patient will be so treated only if the level of A 3 AR in the WBC of the subject is above a predefined threshold, which is about twice the level of A 3 AR in WBC of healthy subjects. The inflammatory state may particularly be rheumatoid arthritis or uveitis.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention is in the fields of diagnosis and determining effectiveness of treatment of inflammation and in particular to use therefore of biological markers associated with inflammatory states.

PRIOR ART

The following is a list of prior art which is considered to be pertinent for describing the state of the art in the field of the invention. Acknowledgement of these references herein will at times be made by indicating their number within brackets from the list below.

-   1. Fishman P, Madi L, Bar-Yehuda S, Barer F, Del Valle L, Khalili K.     Evidence for involvement of Wnt signaling pathway in IB-MECA     mediated suppression of melanoma cells. Oncogene., 21:4060-4064     (2002). -   2. Fishman P, Bar-Yehuda S, Rath-Wolfson L, Ardon E, Barrer F,     Ochaion A, Madi L. Targeting the A3 adenosine receptor for cancer     therapy: inhibition of Prostate carcinoma cell growth by A₃AR     agonist. Anticancer Res., 23:2077-2083 (2003). -   3. Madi L, Bar-Yehuda S, Barer F, Ardon E, Ochaion A, Fishman P. A3     adenosine receptor activation in melanoma cells: association between     receptor fate and tumor growth inhibition. J. Bio. Chem.,     278:42121-42130 (2003). -   4. Ohana G, Bar-Yehuda S, Arich A, Madi L, Dreznick Z, Silberman D,     Slosman G, Volfsson-Rath L, Fishman P. Inhibition of primary colon     carcinoma growth and liver metastasis by the A3 adenosine receptor     agonist IB-MECA. British J. Cancer., 89:1552-1558 (2003). -   5. Fishman P, Bar-Yehuda S, Ohana G, Ochaion A, Engelberg A, Barer     F, Madi L. An agonist to the A3 adenosine receptor inhibits colon     carcinoma growth in mice via modulation of GSK-3β and NF-κB.     Oncogene, 23:2465-2471 (2004). -   6. US Patent Application No. 2004016709 A1. -   7. Szabo, C., et al. Suppression of macrophage inflammatory protein     (MIP)-1α production and collagen-induced arthritis by adenosine     receptor agonists. British J. Pharmacology, 125:379-387 (1998). -   8. Mabley, J., et al. The adenosine A₃ receptor agonist,     N⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine -5′-N-methyluronamide, is protective in     two murine models of colitis. Europ. J. Pharmacology, 466:323-329     (2003). -   9. Baharav, E., et al. The effect of adenosine and the A₃ adenosine     receptor agonist IB-MECA on joint inflammation and autoimmune     diseases models. Inter. J. Mol. Med. 10(supplement 1) page 5104,     abstract 499 (2002). -   10. PCT Application, publication No. WO2005/0063246, entitled     “Method for Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis”. -   11. Montesinos, M. Carmen, et al. Adenosine A_(2A) or A₃ receptors     are required for inhibition of inflammation by methotrexate and its     analog MX-68. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 48:240-247 (2003). -   12. Madi L, Ochaion A, Rath-Wolfson L, Bar-Yehuda S, Erlanger A,     Ohana G, Harish A, Merimski O, Barer F, Fishman P. The A3 Adenosine     Receptor is Highly Expressed in Tumor vs. Normal Cells: Potential     Target for Tumor Growth Inhibition. Clinical Cancer Research, 10:     4472-4479, 2004. -   13. US Patent Application, publication No. 20040137477 A1, entitled     “A3AR as a marker for a diseased state”. -   14. Gessi, S. et al. Elevated expression of A₃ adenosine receptors     in human colorectal cancer is reflected in peripheral blood cells     Clinical Cancer Research 10:5895-5901, 2004

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The A₃ adenosine receptor, a G_(i) protein-associated cell surface receptor, was proposed as a target to combat cancer and inflammation. The receptor is highly expressed in various tumor cell types while expression in adjacent normal tissues is relatively low. Activation of the receptor by a specific synthetic agonist induces modulation of downstream signal transduction pathways which include the Wnt and the NF-kB, resulting in tumor growth inhibition (1-5).

In vivo studies have shown that A₃AR agonists inhibit the development of colon, prostate and pancreatic carcinomas as well as melanoma and hepatoma. A₃AR agonists were also been shown to act as anti-inflammatory agents by ameliorating the inflammatory process in different experimental autoimmune models such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease and multiple sclerosis (6-10). It was proposed also that the A_(2A) and A₃ receptors mediate the anti-inflammatory effects of methotrexate (11).

A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR) expression levels are elevated in cancer cells as compared to normal cells (12). Thus, the A₃AR expression level has been described as a means for the diagnosis of cancer (13). In addition, A₃AR expression levels have also been described to be elevated in peripheral blood cells of patients with colorectal cancer (14).

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the invention to provide a method for determining an inflammatory state in a subject.

Another object of the invention to provide a method for determining the severity of an inflammatory state in a subject.

It is a further object of the invention to provide a method for determining the effectiveness of an anti-inflammatory therapeutic treatment of a subject.

It is yet a further object of the invention to provide a method for selecting subjects to receive anti-inflammatory therapeutic treatment.

The present invention is based on the surprising finding that there is an increase in the level of A₃ adenosine receptor expression in the WBC of a subject who has an inflammatory condition as compared to the WBC of a healthy subject. Furthermore, it was found that in subjects who respond to anti-inflammatory drug treatment, there is a reduction in the level of A₃ adenosine receptor expression in their WBC. This finding paves the way for the use of the A₃ adenosine receptor expression level as a means for the diagnosis of an inflammatory state, as well as other applications described below.

In a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of determining an inflammatory state in a subject that comprises determining the level of expression of A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR) in white blood cells (WBC), e.g. circulating WBCs, from the subject. A high level of expression of A₃AR is indicative of an inflammatory state in the subject.

The sample comprising WBC may be whole blood or may be a blood fraction that contains WBC. At times, it may be desired to use a fraction that includes a specific population of WBC such as mononuclear cells (MNC), sub-populations of MNC—monocytes or lymphocytes, or a sub-population of lymphocytes, e.g. T-cells, B-cell or their sub-populations. A WBC-comprising sample may also at times be obtained from the lymphatic system, e.g. from lymph nodes.

Determining the level of expression may be carried out through determination of the level of A₃AR mRNA as well or the level of A₃AR protein. The term “level of expression” as used herein thus includes the level of A₃AR mRNA as well as the level of A₃AR protein or A₃AR protein fragments in the sampled cells.

It was found that medication may influence the level of the A₃AR expression. Thus, past disease history including prior or current treatment, may influence the A₃AR expression level and my need to be taken into account in the performance of the methods of the invention.

In a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for determining the severity of an inflammatory state in a subject comprising determining the level of expression of A₃AR in WBC of the subject; and comparing the level of expression of A₃AR in the cells with the level of prior determined standards that correlate A₃AR expression level with severity of infection. The prior determined standards may include, for example, a set of values, which may be a list of discrete values or a continuous curve, correlating results to a measure of severity of inflammation; or it may be a set of descriptors, such as a qualitative list of possible results and their meanings in respect of severity of inflammation, e.g. if the outcome is manifested as a color reaction, the descriptors may list the range of possible color or color intensity outcomes and their meaning in respect of severity of inflammation; or it may included graphical or pictorial representations of expected assay outcomes for different severities of inflammation or different inflammatory states; or a set of reference standards, which may be run in parallel with the sample for calibration and evaluation of the data. The standards may typically be obtained by assaying expression level of A₃AR in a plurality of samples from each of a number of inflammatory diseases states to obtain a statistical measure on the correlation between expression level and the disease state. The classification into disease states may for example be binary: light inflammation and severe inflammation. The classification may also include a plurality of different states, such as, for example, light, moderate and severe inflammation. The classification may also be by the use of a numerical value, according to the level of expression, e.g. a number between 1 and 10, for corresponding light through severe inflammation, etc. As will be appreciated, there may be many types of classifications and the invention is not limited to specific types of classifications.

In a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for determining the effectiveness of an anti-inflammatory therapeutic treatment of a subject, the treatment comprising administering an A₃AR agonist to the subject. The treatment may be a monotherapy with an A₃AR or a combination therapy of an A₃AR with another drug, such as a combination of an A₃AR with methotrexate. The method comprises determining the expression level of A₃AR in WBCs from the subject in two or more successive time points, at least one of which is during an anti-inflammatory treatment, wherein a difference in the level being indicative of effectiveness of the drug treatment. The successive time points may, for example be one or more taken before an anti-inflammatory treatment and one or more during the treatment, one or more taken during the treatment and one or more taken during a treatment cessation.

The A₃AR level of expression in WBC in accordance with some embodiments of the invention may be used for determining the state or severity of inflammation, e.g. for determining the presence or absence of an inflammatory state. In accordance with other embodiments of the invention, the A3AR level of expression may be used for quantitative determination of the degree of severity of the inflammatory state. Thus, the term “determining” or “determination” as used herein encompasses both quantitative and qualitative determination.

An “inflammatory state” includes any state of active or sub-clinical inflammation. By a preferred embodiment the invention is used for determining an inflammatory state in subjects suffering from and autoimmune inflammatory disease. The inflammation may be due to an inflammatory disease, or it may be a side effect of some other type of disease or disorder. Examples of inflammatory diseases include but are not limited to inflammatory bowel diseases, inflammatory corpuscle, inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia, inflammatory gallbladder disease, inflammatory papillary hyperplasia and autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune diseases may include any of the following: rheumatoid arthritis, Myasthenia Gravis (MG), Congenital myasthenia gravis, Multiple sclerosis (MS), Stiff-man syndrome, Tropical spastic paraparesis, Rasmussen's encephalitis, Acute motor axonal neuropathy, Acute sensory-motor axonal neuropathy, Dorsal root ganglion neuritis, Acute pan-autonomic neuropathy, Brachial neuritis, Acute necrotizing hemorrhagic lekoencephalitis, Sporadic necrotizing myelopathy, Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, Guillain-Barre syndrome, Limbic encephalitis, Opsoclonus-myoclonus ataxia, Sensory neuronitis, Autonomic neuropathy, Demyelinating neuropathy, AIDS-dementia complex, Tourette's syndrome, Miller-Fisher syndrome, Alzheimer's disease, Graves' Disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Postpartum thyroiditis, Focal thyroiditis, Juvenile thyroiditis, Idiopathic hypothyroidism, Type I (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus, Addison's disease, Hypophysitis, Autoimmune diabetes insipidus, Hypoparathyroidism, Pemphigus Vulgaris, Pemphigus Foliaceus, Bullous phemphigoid, Pemphigoid gestationis, Cicatrical pemphigoid, Dermatitis herpetiformis, Epidermal bullosa acquisita, Erythema multiforme, Herpes gestatonis, Vitiligo, Chronic urticaria, Discoid lupus, Alopecia universalis/Areata, Psoriasis, Autoimmune hepatitis, Primary biliary cirrhosis, Chronic active hepatitis, Chronic active hepatitits/Primary biliary cirrhosis overlap syndrome, Primary sclerosing cholangitis, Autoimmune hemolytic anemia, Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, Evans syndrome, Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, Primary autoimmune neutropenia, Autoimmune (primary) neutropenia of infancy, Autoimmune neutropenia following bone marrow transplant, Acquired autoimmune hemophilia, Autoimmune gastritis and pernicious anemia, Coeliac disease, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis, Sialadenitis, Autoimmune premature ovarian failure, Azoospermia, Hypogonadism, Male infertility associated with sperm autoantibodies, Autoimmune orchitis, Premature ovarian failure, Autoimmune oophoritis, Uveitis, Retinitis, Sympathetic ophthalmia, Birdshot retinochoroidopathy, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada granulomatous uveitis, Retinal degeneration, Lens-induced uveitis, Optic neuritis, Autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss, Meniere's disease, Autoimmune myocarditis, Congenital heart block (neonatal lupus), Chagas' disease, Adriamycin cardiotoxicity, Dressler's myocarditis syndrome, Bronchial asthma, Interstitial fibrosing lung disease, Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, Autoimmune tubulointerstitial nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Antiphospholipid syndrome, Rheumatoid arthritis, Juvenile Rheumatoid arthritis, Felty's syndrome, Large granular lymphocytosis (LGL), Sjogren's syndrome, Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), Crest syndrome, Mixed connective tissue disease, Polymyositis/dermatomyositis, Goodpasture's Disease, Wegener's granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, Henoch-Schonlein purpura, Microscopic polyangiatis, Periarteritis nodosa, Bechet's syndrome, Atherosclerosis, Temporal (giant) cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, Kawasaki disease, Ankylosing spondilitis, Reiter's disease, Sneddons disease, Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy, candidiasis-ectodermal dystropy, Essential cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, Cutaneous leukocytoclastic angiitis, Lyme disease, Rheumatic fever and heart disease, Eosinophilic fasciitis, Paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, Polymyalgia rheumatica, Fibromyalgia, POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-spot and skin changes), Relapsing polychondritis, Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, TINU syndrome (acute tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis), Common variable immunodeficiency, TAP (transporter associated with antigen presentation) deficiency, Omenn syndrome, HyperIgM syndrome, BTK agammaglobulinemia, Human immunodeficiency virus and Post bone-marrow-transplant.

The sample comprising WBC used in the methods of the invention may include any of the known types of cells which make up this group. In particular, the sample should preferably include mononuclear cells (monocytes and/or lymphocytes). At times, the sample may include in addition, or in the alternative, granulocytes (neutrophils, eosinophils or basophils).

In a first embodiment, a high level of expression of A₃AR is employed as an indicator of an inflammatory state in the subject. The term “high level” is to be understood as meaning a significantly higher level of expression than in normal cells. For example, the level of the A₃AR expression in the WBC may be compared to a control level, the control level being the level of A₃AR expression in normal WBC of a healthy subject. At times it may be useful to determine the expression level by testing an assayed sample from an individual in parallel to one or more reference standards, e.g. one reference standard indicative of a normal state and another indicative of an inflammatory state; or one reference standard indicative of a normal state and two or more of different disease states.

In a second embodiment, the determined expression level is compared to standards. The standards may be based on previously determined levels from healthy individuals and from individuals with an inflammatory state or with different inflammatory states. The standards may be provided, for example, in the form of discrete numeric values or, in case the assay method is colorimetric, in the form of a chart with different colors or shadings for healthy and inflammatory states; or they may be provided in the form of a comparative curve prepared on the basis of such standards.

Such standards may be prepared by determining the level of A₃AR expression (which may be the level of A₃AR protein, protein fragment, or mRNA level etc., as discussed above) present in WBC cells obtained from a plurality of patients positively diagnosed (by other means, for example by a physician, by histological techniques etc.) as having inflammation at varying levels of severity. The severity of the disease for the preparation of the standards may also be determined by various conventional methods such as by pathological techniques. In another embodiment, the assay is carried out in parallel to a number of standards of healthy subjects and subjects of different inflammatory states and the level determined in the assayed sample is then compared to such standards.

For example, a protein content level of between X₁ to X₂ per 1,000,000 cells may be defined as being indicative of grade 1 inflammation, a higher protein content of Y₁ to Y₂ per 1,000,000 cells may be defined as being indicative of grade 2 inflammation, etc. After such standards are prepared, it is possible to compare the level of A3AR expression obtained from a specific individual to the corresponding value of the standards, and thus obtain an assessment of the severity of the disease.

The effectiveness of an anti-inflammatory therapeutic treatment of a subject may be assessed by taking samples of WBC at various time points before, during and after the treatment. For example, a first sample may be taken at a time point prior to initiation of the treatment and a second sample may be taken at a time point during the treatment. A decrease in the level of the A₃AR expression in the second sample as compared to the first sample would be indicative that the treatment is effective. The degree of decrease could be indicative of the degree of effectiveness of the treatment, i.e. the correlation would be quantitative.

In another example, a first sample may be taken at a time point during the treatment and a second sample may be taken at a time point during the treatment subsequent to the time point of the first sample. A decrease in the level of the A₃AR expression in the second sample as compared to the first sample would be indicative that the treatment is effective.

In a third example, a first sample may be taken at a time point during the treatment and a second sample may be taken at a time point after the treatment has been discontinued. In this case, an increase in the level of the A₃AR expression in the second sample as compared to the first sample would be indicative that the treatment is effective.

Of course, various other combinations may be carried out, as well as the taking of samples at more than two time points.

The invention also provided a method for selecting a subject suffering from a certain inflammatory disease, to receive anti-inflammatory therapeutic treatment that comprises administering to the subject an A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR) agonist, the method comprising determining the level of expression of A₃AR in the WBCs of the subject and selecting the subject to receive said anti-inflammatory therapeutic treatment if said level is above a predetermined level. Said predetermined level may be a certain threshold level for all subjects. Said predetermined level may also be a range of levels for different patient groups, for example: for different age groups; for different disease states; for different disease histories—histories of past medication (for example, methotrexate was found to induce an increase in the level of A₃AR) number of years having the disease, etc. Said predetermined level may be determined through clinical studies that look for correlation between receptor expression and a drug response according to one of the acceptable response criteria, such as the ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 set by the American College of Rheumatology, or any other acceptable efficacy criteria.

Selection of subjects suitable for anti-inflammatory treatment may be executed by determining the level of expression of A₃AR in a sample of WBC withdrawn from said subject before treatment. The subject is selected if the determined level of A₃AR is above a predefined threshold.

According to one embodiment, the threshold is a certain multiple of the level of A₃AR expression in WBC of a healthy subject. According to another embodiment, the threshold is determined on the basis of the average expression level in patients having said certain inflammatory disease, and may be said average or a certain multiple or fraction thereof. By a further embodiment, the threshold is determined on the basis of clinical studies in human patients that are designed to determine the correlation between the level of expression and the response of the patients to said therapeutic treatment. As will be appreciated, the threshold may be different for different inflammatory diseases. As may also be appreciated, by its nature such a selection criterion is based on statistics and thus signifies a certain probability that a selected patient may respond to a treatment. Thus, such a selection criterion, as will no doubt be appreciated by a person versed in the art, such selection criteria may not be completely predictive as to response and there may also be a certain fraction of patients selected in this was who will not respond to the treatment.

The selection method may also apply for selecting candidates for participating in clinical studies to test the efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatments comprising administering to patients an A₃AR agonist, either alone or in combination with other drugs such as methotrexate. As appreciated by those versed in the art, a clinical study (also known by the terms ‘clinical trial’ or ‘clinical protocol’), is a scientific study in human volunteers to determine how a new medicine or treatment works in human subjects. Interventional trials determine whether experimental treatments or new ways of using known therapies are safe and effective under controlled environments. It is through clinical studies that physicians find new and better ways to prevent, detect, diagnose, control, and treat illnesses. The clinical studies for which patients are selected, in accordance with the invention, based on the A₃AR level may be Phase I, Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV or any other type of clinical study.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In order to understand the invention and to see how it may be carried out in practice, a preferred embodiment will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIGS. 1A-1D depict exemplary Western blots and corresponding bar graphs of average blot intensity and standard error showing that A₃AR is up-regulated in inflammatory and hematopoietic tissues upon occurrence of inflammation.

FIG. 2 depicts a Western blot and the corresponding bar graph of average blot intensity and standard error showing that the level of expression of A₃AR correlates with Disease Clinical Score in AIA model. “0” indicates Naïve animals (animals without inflammation) and “6”, “9” and “12” relate to inflamed animals and the numbers indicate the inflammatory score in these animals.

FIG. 3 is a graph showing the change in severity of arthritis as a function of time in control animals and in AIA animals treated with either methotrexate (MTX), CF101 (clinical grade IB-MECA), a combination of MTX and CF101 or vehicle only (control).

FIGS. 4A-4B depict exemplary Western blots and corresponding bar graphs with standard errors showing A₃AR protein expression level in lymph node (FIG. 4A) and spleen (FIG. 4B) cells in naïve animals, in AIA animal and in AIA animals after CF 101 (clinical grade IB-MECA) treatment.

FIGS. 5A-5C depict an exemplary Western blots and the corresponding bar graphs with standard errors showing A₃AR protein expression level in paw (FIG. 5A), synovial tissue (FIG. 5B) and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (FIG. 5C) in AIA either vehicle treated or treated with CF101.

FIG. 6 depicts a Western blot and the corresponding bar graph showing A₃AR protein expression level in lymph nodes in naïve animals, AIA animals and in AIA animals treated with MTX.

FIG. 7 depicts a Western blot and the corresponding bar graph showing A₃AR protein expression level in 7 healthy subjects and in 7 RA patients.

FIG. 8 is a bar graph showing A₃AR level in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of RA patients before and after 3 months of treatment with CF101. For each patient the response in % according to ACR criteria (criteria for determining efficacy of drugs for treating RA, set down by the American College of Rheumatology).

FIG. 9 shows Western blots of A₃AR expression in PBMNCs and corresponding bar graphs of expression intensity in 4 patients before (dark columns) and after (grey columns) and during methotrexate treatment, measured in arbitrary units.

EXAMPLES Materials and Methods Induction of Adjuvant Induced Arthritis (AIA) Model in Rats

Female Lewis rats, aged 8-12 weeks were obtained from Harlan Laboratories (Jerusalem, Israel). Rats were maintained on a standardized pelleted diet and supplied with tap water. Experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Can-Fite BioPharma, Petah Tikva, Israel. The rats were injected subcutaneously (SC) at the tail base with 100 μl of suspension composed of incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) with 10 mg/ml heat killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis, (Mt) H37Ra, (Difco, Detroit, USA). Each group contained 10 animals.

Treatment with IB-MECA (10 μg/kg) was initiated on day 14 after vaccination and was orally administered by gavage, twice daily. Another group was treated with Methotrexate (MTX) (1.5 mg/kg) intraperitoneally every 3 days, starting on day 14th after vaccination. The control group in each experiment received vehicle only (DMSO in a dilution corresponding to that of the drugs).

Clinical Disease Activity Score was assessed as follows: the animals were inspected every second day for clinical arthritis. The scoring system ranged from 0-4 of each limb: 0—no arthritis; 1—redness or swelling of one toe/finger joint; 2—redness and swelling of more than one toe/finger joints, 3—the ankle and tarsal-metatarsal joints involvement. 4—entire paw redness or swelling. The clinical score was calculated by adding the four individual legs' score. The inflammatory intensity was also determined in accordance with the increase in the rat hind paw's diameter, measured by caliper (Mitotoyo, Tokyo, Japan).

Separation of Inflammatory and Hematopoietic Tissues and Preparation of Protein Extracts

a. Inflammatory Tissues

The hind paws were dissected above the ankle joint. The bony tissue was broken into pieces, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80° C. until use. To prepare a protein extract, RIPA buffer (containing 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, 1% NP40, 0.5% Deoxycholate and 0.1% SDS) was added to the paw tissue (4 ml/gr of tissue). The mixture was homogenized on ice with a polytron and centrifuged.

Synovial tissue was removed and synovial cells were separated by incubating the tissue in RPMI containing 1 mg/ml Collagenase IV and 0.1 mg/ml DNase with a vigorous shaking (200 rpm) at 37° C. for 30 min. The supernatant containing the synovial cells was collected and the undigested tissue was re-extracted. The supernatants from both extractions were combined and cells were washed with PBS. Protein extracts were prepared.

b. Hemopoietic Tissues

Lymph nodes were removed and cells were separated by first mincing the tissue and disaggregating it through a needle of 22 G Spleens were removed and subjected to Lymphoprep (Nycomed AS, Oslo, Norway) for mononuclear cell separation. Protein extracts were prepared.

Separation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from RA Patients and Healthy Subjects

Blood was withdrawn from healthy subjects or RA patients. Mononuclear cells (lymphocytes and monocytes) were separated using Ficoll-Hypaque gradient. Protein was extracted from the mononuclear cells.

Clinical Study

Blood was withdrawn from RA patients who were enrolled in a clinical study sponsored by Can-Fite BioPharma, in which the effect of CF101, a clinical grade IB-MECA, on arthritic patients was evaluated. The patients randomly received 0.1, 1.0 or 4.0 mg of CF101 twice daily. Blood was withdrawn at 2 time points: (a) after a washout period of 4-6 weeks from a previous treatment and before CF101 treatment was initiated—this was considered as baseline level; (b) after 3 months of treatment with CF101. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated and protein was extracted as described above. In addition, C reactive protein (CRP) values, the number of tender and swollen joints, the physicians global assessment, the patient own assessment, the pain score and the disability score were recorded and the ACR score was calculated for each patient (ACR is a score that is calculated according to criteria established by the American College of Rheumatology, based on the aforementioned measures, to evaluate the effectiveness of drugs for treatment of RA; ACR 20, ACR 50 and ACR 70 respectively represent a 20%, 50% and 70% improvement in this score).

Analysis of A₃AR Protein Expression Level by Western Blot (WB)

Western blot analysis (WB) of synovial, paw, spleen and lymph nodes were carried out according to the following protocol. Samples were rinsed with ice-cold PBS and transferred to ice-cold lysis buffer (TNN buffer, 50 mM Tris buffer pH=7.5, 150 mM NaCl, NP 40). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation for 10 min, at 7500×g. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay dye reagent. Equal amounts of the sample (50 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE, using 12% polyacrylamide gels. The resolved proteins were then electro-blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H., USA). Membranes were blocked with 1% BSA and incubated with the primary antibody against A₃AR (dilution 1:1000) for 24 h at 4° C. Blots were then washed and incubated with a secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Bands were recorded using BCIP/NBT color development kit (Promega, Madison, Wis., USA).

Results A3AR is Up-Regulated in Inflammatory and Hematopoietic Tissues

The level of expression of A₃AR in AIA model was determined by WB analysis. To this end, protein extracts from inflamed tissue (paw) or from peripheral hematopoietic tissue (peripheral blood mononuclear cells, lymph nodes and spleen) were obtained and analyzed as described in the Materials and Methods. FIGS. 1A-1D present WB analysis results, also presented in corresponding bar graphs, which give average results and the standard deviation. As shown, A₃AR is up-regulated in inflamed tissue (FIG. 1A) as well as in peripheral hematopoietic tissues (FIGS. 1B-1D).

The level of expression of A₃AR in AIA model correlated also with Disease Clinical Score (FIG. 2) providing further evidence for the correlation between inflammation and A₃AR expression.

CF101 Inhibits the Development of AIA

About 21 days after immunization, most of the vehicle treated animals progressively developed arthritis. CF101 treatment (10 μg/kg, given orally twice daily, starting on day 14th after immunization) and methotrexate (MTX) treatment resulted in a significant decrease in disease severity, very similar for both drugs, as was evaluated by the arthritis clinical score. Disease peaked on days 21-28 and maximal effect of CF101 or MTX was seen on these days (FIG. 3).

A3AR is Highly Expressed in Inflammatory Tissues and in Peripheral Hematopoietic Tissues of AIA Rats

Low A₃AR expression level was detected in the healthy paw & synovial tissues. In the inflammatory tissues derived from AIA rats, a marked increase in the A₃AR protein expression level was noted (FIGS. 4A-4B). Upon IB-MECA treatment A₃AR level was down-regulated (FIGS. 4A-4B). A similar pattern was noted in the peripheral hematopoietic tissues, i.e., low A₃AR expression level was noted in the spleen and lymph node (LN) derived from naïve animals, high in the tissues from AIA and low expression in the tissues of IB-MECA treated rats (FIGS. 5A-5C). In LN derived from AIA rats treated with MTX, a similar A₃AR expression profile was observed (FIG. 6).

High A3AR Expression is Found in MNC Derived from RA Vs. Low in Healthy Subjects

Low A₃AR expression level was found in MNC from healthy subjects whereas high expression was detected in MNC derived from RA patients (FIG. 7).

Correlation Between A3AR Expression and Clinical Efficacy Parameters

Blood was withdrawn from 17 RA patients who participated in a clinical study for testing the effect of CF101 on the manifestation of disease in such patients. The blood was withdrawn following a washout period from previous treatment and then after 3 months of treatment, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) were separated and the level of A₃AR was determined in these cells. As can be seen in FIG. 8, out of these 17 patients, 5 were non-responders, namely these patients have not even achieved an ACR 20 response, while the other 13 patienst were responders as they had at least an ACR 20 response (as can be seen in FIG. 8, 3 of the responders had an ACR 70 response, 5 achieved an ACR 50 response and another 4 an ACR 20 only response).

As can further be seen in FIG. 8, all ACR 50 and ACR 70 responders had an initial high level of A₃AR, which was reduced after 3 months treatment, while there was essentially no change in the A₃AR level in the non-responders. The patient marked by an “*” (patient no. 1517), while having no ACR response (in view of the fact that the change in the CRP level, one of the parameters used for calculating the ACR score—see below, was below 0%), had a very significant improvement in other parameters, particularly the number of swollen and tender joints.

These data clearly demonstrate the ability to use the A3AR level in order to predict a response of patient to an anti-inflammatory drug therapy, particularly such therapy which makes use of an A₃AR agonists as a disease modifying drug.

Up Regulation of A₃AR Expression Level in Methotrexate Treated RA Patients

Blood samples were taken from 4 RA patients prior to and after onset of treatment with methotrexate. PBMNCs were separated and the A₃AR levels were assayed as described above. The results that are shown in FIG. 9, demonstrate that treatment with methotrexate induces an increase in the level of the A₃AR.

These data show that past disease history, in particular past medication, may influence the A₃AR level in PBMNCs and this history may need to be taken into account for the performance of methods according to the invention. 

1. A therapeutic method, comprising: a. determining the level of A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR) in a sample of white blood cells (WBCs) of a subject; and b. treating the subject only if said level is above a predefined threshold which is about twice the level of A₃AR in WBC of healthy subjects; wherein (i) the subject is one that is known to have an inflammatory state, (ii) the treating comprises administering an anti-inflammatory agent to the subject, and (iii) the anti-inflammatory agent is an A₃AR agonist; wherein the treating step comprises treating the subject with an amount of A₃AR agonist that is effective to reduce the inflammatory state in said subject.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the A₃AR is N⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5′-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA).
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample of WBC is taken from a subject before receiving the anti-inflammatory treatment.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the inflammatory state is the result of an autoimmune disease.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the inflammatory state is the result of rheumatoid arthritis or uveitis.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the A₃AR is N⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5′-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA).
 7. A method for anti-inflammatory therapeutic treatment of a subject known to have an inflammatory state, the method comprising: a. determining the level of A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR) in a sample of white blood cells (WBCs) of the subject; and b. treating the subject with an anti-inflammatory agent only if the level is above a predefined threshold which is about twice the level of A₃AR in WBC of healthy subjects; wherein the anti-inflammatory agent is an A₃AR agonist and the amount of the A₃AR agonist is effective to reduce the inflammatory state in said subject.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the A₃AR is N⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5′-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA).
 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the sample of WBC is taken from the subject before receiving the anti-inflammatory treatment.
 10. The method of claim 7, wherein the inflammatory state is the result of an autoimmune disease.
 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the inflammatory state is the result of rheumatoid arthritis or uveitis.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the A₃AR is N⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5′-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA).
 13. In a method for anti-inflammatory therapeutic treatment of a subject known to have an inflammatory state, the method comprising treating the subject with an effective amount of an A3 adenosine receptor (A₃AR) agonist, wherein the improvement comprises selecting the subject to receive the anti-inflammatory therapeutic treatment if determined to have a level of A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR), in a sample of white blood cells (WBCs) of the subject, above a predefined threshold that is about twice the level of A₃AR in WBC of healthy subjects, and withholding said treatment if determined to have a level of A₃AR, in a sample of WBCs of the subject, below the predefined threshold.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the A₃AR is N⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5′-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA).
 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the sample of WBCs is taken from a subject before receiving the anti-inflammatory treatment.
 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the inflammatory state is the result of an autoimmune disease.
 17. The method of claim 13, wherein the inflammatory state is the result of rheumatoid arthritis or uveitis.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the A₃AR is N⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5′-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA). 